There are many reasons I see for having a digitally distributed conference format, especially on learning in the way people have been trying to promote at several of the conferences I know of. So, let's got on with this, after you read, or reread, this post. I don't intend to pull any punches either.
First off, I'm surprised at the resistance to the idea. Economic pressures are hitting those who would normally go to these conferences, so having a lower cost to attend makes sense just as a means of keeping those conferences alive and well. Most conferences are walled gardens as securely locked as the LMSes being condemned for the same behavior. Seemed to me this would have been obvious, and enough, to pursue the idea.
I'm one of those students that would like to be a part of the discussions. Right now I'm yelling with all my might to be allowed to participate, and being asked, "Why? What's the point?" Well, you asked for it, so here it is. I've read about many conferences like E3, the GDCs, Virtual World Conferences, Mobile learning conferences, Northern Voice, GLS and many others that I have no way to possibly participate in. I'm stuck as a passive content consumer, when I even have that option, and it's ticking me off. After hearing people want to hear from people like me, I'm shut out of the real events. I'm just too determined to make my ideas reality to care if you are standing in my way.
Blogging just DOESN'T cut it as participation. I'm a student, a game designer, a full time employee, potentially the User Interface & Experience designer for a start-up, an educational entrepreneur and that leaves little time for me or blogging, let alone the social blogging needed to participate in the discussions. Each of those things I listed are completely seperate endeavors. People like me CAN break into circles and get mentioned in OLDaily, but most of the people who need to be hearing about this stuff aren't going to push themselves into your conversations for long enough to really count. The proof is in the history of these efforts. I've read such sentiments from several edubloggers.
How many people in the educational institutions are actually participating in a way comparable to Jim Groom? I know there are some out there, but most of these people are not connected. It would cost a fair amount for an institution to be fully participating in the blogsphere, and most of them would ask, "Why? What's the point?" Hmmm, sounds familiar.
If you want people outside your circles to participate, you have to take it to them. You have to give them a chance to see what's really going on, without all the press and other noise. I want to participate in the conventions and other events and am locked out by the restrictions. How many others like me do you think there are who don't even consider going to a convention, let alone several, due to the costs involved from time to money? How many more are just curious or don't know these events go on? These people are the ones who need to know this is going on for this to serious catch on and happen like a grassroots effort. Many of the serious don't have the time to put into the blogsphere to be a part of your conversations.
So, why would I say an Open Digitally Distributed Convention is the answer? That is because of the nature of a convention. People come intending to think about the topics. They choose to devote an acceptable amount of time to the event. So, they are intentionally receptive.
Those receptive people then participate in ways beyond passive content consumption in the present. Spontaneous talks in the hallway can be done through chats and in local venues. Meeting people who you might actually be able to work with locally doesn't happen at a normal convention, but could in the kind I am suggesting. That means it facilitates small local projects, networking and the generation of new ideas.
Then there are those who can't attend in a traditional way. You don't know how many people don't attend who would blow your mind with potential solutions they don't do anything with. Digital distribution and multiple viewing venues means that these people have options. Maybe they will participate in your local chats while watching the same interactive presentations. Maybe they will arrange, or participate in, viewing and venues with no physical location.
Institutions can become actively active in these kinds of events just by allowing those interested to use their facilities. Students and teachers, along with other faculty and maybe even some policy makers will watch or participate. I for one intend to approach the college I attend about local open venues for this if, no WHEN, it comes to pass.
I realize most of those who have criticized and questioned are not being aggressive or accusatory, but this is a serious sore spot for me. When I want to participate, I get told one thing or another about why I can't do it. Normally I'm nice, quiet and just keep at it. My usual verbal response is, "Just watch." Then I proceed to do what was said to be impossible. This isn't like those times because to go forward I have to get others to understand why I am so determined. I suspect and hope that somebody less connected to this will do a nicer toned recap. I'm not that person, and these feelings are just as much of the reason for my determination as the logic. Others who want to help are likely just as foamy at the mouth.
Even if the normal conference venue is only changed in doing live feeds for the event, open chats and other such things, it would be great. By using the ideas and techniques that are talked about we do many things. We gives examples, proof, guidance, ideas, inspiration, permission and much more regarding social motivation for people to emulate the model. The more the model is emulated, the more it is likely to be considered acceptable, eventually leading to a paradigm shift. That's how they usually happen.
I know there are a bunch of logistics to be worked out. I've already figured out some of the answers. First is that we need ways, plural, to guide people to find these events and resources. Links to and from convention sites and blogs should work with the mechanics of internet searches to make those sites easy to find. Second, we need to supply the help for individuals, groups and institutions to participate like was done in the Obama campaign. I want to use a URL I have in providing such a place, but I don't have the hosting or anything else needed to do this. That's part of why I posted something on Jim Groom's blog. People who know the things I don't could be reached through it. Third we need somebody dedicated, capable and crazy enough to pull this off, even if they are nothing more than a figure head. Fourth, each place takes care of itself, each presentation takes care of itself, with outside help when needed. This both gives people experience in organizing and distributes the demands of such an endeavor to the point that it can be free at the higher levels and possibly free at every venue.
This is no delusional dream. I'm not fooled into thinking this is going to go off without a hitch or have all campuses participate. However, as I said to Jim, "If we intrigue those who influence the circles, and those who want to participate without knowing how, I'll call it a success regardless of numbers." This is a catalyst event. You may look around and wonder how it is any different for your circles, but I look at this as the ability to be a part of those circles. I want in, and I want others to be able to get in.
If you want to know just how persistent, determined and factually backed I am, read up on my MBTI personality type, INTJ. If need be, I'll captain this ship, go down with it and resurface just because I'm that way. While I don't like taking charge, if I see no other way, I will.
http://typelogic.com/intj.html
http://www.personalitypage.com/INTJ.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INTJ
http://www.geocities.com/lifexplore/intj.htm
http://www.keirsey.com/handler.aspx?s=keirsey&f=fourtemps&tab=5&c=mastermind
http://fuzzy.snakeden.org/intj/
http://www.mypersonality.info/personality-types/intj/
http://intjcentral.com/
http://www.socionics.com/prof/intj.htm
http://www.e-mbti.com/intj.php
http://www.teamtechnology.co.uk/myers-briggs/intj.htm
There's some really funny stuff in those, but I may be a little biased.
Have fun, spread the word and tell me what you think,
Igen Oukan
Read more!